landlords

Rogue Landlords vs Rogue Lenders: The True Cost of Ignoring Consumer Rights in 2026

June 04, 202610 min read

Whether the party cutting corners is a landlord ignoring damp or a lender ignoring affordability, the pattern is often the same. A stronger party has duties, the consumer carries the consequences when those duties are ignored, and the cost builds quietly over time.

In 2026, tenants and borrowers have stronger routes to challenge poor treatment. The Renters’ Rights Act 2025 and Awaab’s Law have tightened the rules around rented homes, while the Consumer Duty and the FCA’s motor finance redress scheme have sharpened expectations on lenders. The true cost is rarely just money. It can mean months of stress, poor health, damaged belongings, growing debt and a feeling that nothing will change.

The reassuring part is that both a housing disrepair claim and a finance complaint are usually more straightforward to start than people assume.

This article looks at the two worlds side by side. They feel very different from the inside. The dynamic underneath them is strikingly similar.

Two problems, one pattern

A rogue landlord and a rogue lender are not the same villain. One leaves you in a flat with black mould creeping up the bathroom wall. The other puts you in a finance agreement you could never really afford, or fails to explain a commission arrangement that affected the deal.

But step back and the shape is familiar. A landlord has a duty to provide a safe, habitable home. A lender has a duty to treat customers fairly and check affordability where required. When either side ignores that duty, the consumer absorbs the cost.

The cost lands quietly. A bit more on heating to fight damp. A bit more interest each month. A few more nights lying awake. It rarely arrives as one big bill, which is exactly why people put off doing anything about it.

The rogue landlord in 2026

The numbers show this is not a fringe issue. According to the English Housing Survey, in 2024 around 4 million homes in England, or 15% of all dwellings, failed to meet the Decent Homes Standard. Around 1.4 million homes, or 5%, had a damp problem. Damp was most common in the private rented sector, affecting 10% of dwellings, compared with 7% in social housing and 4% in owner-occupied homes. Around 2.3 million homes, or 9%, had a serious Category 1 hazard.

The law has moved in response. Awaab’s Law, named after 2-year-old Awaab Ishak, who died in 2020 after prolonged exposure to mould in a Rochdale social home, came into force for social landlords on 27 October 2025. Its first phase covers emergency hazards and significant damp and mould hazards in social housing, with further hazards due to be brought in through later phases.

The Renters’ Rights Act 2025 received Royal Assent in October 2025, with major private rented sector changes taking effect from 1 May 2026. These include the abolition of Section 21 no-fault evictions for private rented sector assured tenancies, reforms to possession grounds, limits on rent increases, a ban on rental bidding, and stronger enforcement tools including rent repayment order changes.

The Homes (Fitness for Human Habitation) Act 2018 also remains important. It allows tenants to take action where a rented home is not fit to live in.

What this means in practice is simple. A landlord who drags their feet on serious repairs now has fewer places to hide. The guides on what tenants can realistically expect from private landlords, social housing disrepair claims, and when the council's environmental health team can step in set out the routes available.

A familiar housing example

Take a tenant we will call Priya. She reported damp in her rented flat in the autumn. The letting agent promised someone would come. Months passed. The mould spread to the children’s bedroom, her youngest developed a cough that would not shift, and she spent more on heating to keep the walls dry.

Each month she told herself the repair was coming. What Priya did not realise was that every reported-and-ignored complaint was strengthening her position. A landlord who knows about a serious hazard and fails to act within a reasonable time may be exposing themselves to a claim.

The notes on what to do when the same repair issue keeps coming back, the extra duties owed where children or health conditions are involved, whether you can safely withhold rent, and who is actually responsible, the agent or the landlord would all have helped her act sooner.

The rogue lender in 2026

The lending world has had its own reckoning. The Consumer Duty came into force for open products and services on 31 July 2023, and for closed products and services on 31 July 2024. It requires firms to act to deliver good outcomes for retail customers and avoid foreseeable harm.

On top of that sits the long-running issue of affordability. Lenders should not hand out credit cards, payday loans or finance agreements without proper checks where the repayments are not sustainable.

The biggest current example is motor finance. In March 2026, the FCA confirmed an industry-wide motor finance redress scheme covering unfair motor finance commission arrangements from 6 April 2007 to 1 November 2024. The FCA estimates the scheme will put around £7.5 billion back in consumers’ pockets, with compensation including simple interest based on the annual average Bank of England base rate plus 1%, subject to a 3% minimum for any year. The scheme has faced legal challenge, so timings may still be affected, but the direction is clear. If you were affected, you can claim mis sold car finance directly or with support.

The same affordability logic runs through other lending. If you took out high-cost short-term loans, a payday loan refund UK borrowers pursue follows the same principle: a refund of interest and charges on lending that should not have been granted. The guides on high-interest credit cards and affordability checks, repeat borrowing red flags, and refunds for interest and charges explain how these cases are built.

A familiar finance example

Now take Marcus. He bought a car on finance in 2019. The dealer arranged the deal quickly, and Marcus assumed the rate he was offered was simply the rate available to him. He was not clearly told how commission worked, or whether the broker’s arrangements could have affected the cost of credit.

Years later, he learned his agreement might fall within the redress scheme. The difference between a flat presentation and a fair one may have cost him over the life of the loan.

Marcus’s situation is common. The pieces on what compensation in a car finance case can look like, the difference between misrepresentation and an unfair relationship, how the complaint process splits between dealer, lender, and broker, and what a complaint does to your credit file walk through how it plays out.

Why doing nothing costs the most

People delay for understandable reasons. They worry about upsetting a landlord, the hassle of complaining, or whether they will be believed. On the housing side, there is a specific fear that complaining will trigger eviction. That is why the protections around retaliatory eviction after a disrepair complaint matter, and why the end of Section 21 in 2026 is so significant for private renters.

On the finance side, the worry is usually about the credit file or the cost of making a complaint. Complaining does not, by itself, damage your credit file. A successful affordability complaint may even lead to negative markers being corrected where they relate to unaffordable lending. A regulated no win no fee claims uk service should not charge upfront.

The longer you wait, the more difficult evidence can become, and the closer you move towards a deadline.

Why 2026 is a sensible time to act

Three things line up this year. Housing rules are tighter, with Awaab’s Law now in force for social housing and private rented sector reform underway. The FCA motor finance redress scheme has turned a long-running issue into a structured compensation process. And the affordability principles behind payday, credit card and other consumer credit refunds are well established.

The structure on what evidence helps a finance complaint, the time limits that apply, and how to choose the right solicitor is all settled enough for consumers to act with confidence.

For tenants, the equivalent groundwork sits in the guides on structural cracks and subsidence, electrical hazards in rented homes, communal area disrepair, and how loss of amenity and rent rebates are calculated.

The third villain worth naming

There is a darker version of the rogue lender: one that does not pretend to follow any rules at all. These are the outright fraudsters behind fake trading platforms, cold-call schemes and investment scams uk residents continue to face.

The guides on fake investment platforms and what to do in the first 48 hours after a fake broker scheme cover the warning signs.

There is a cruel twist worth flagging. People chasing legitimate refunds are themselves targeted by recovery room scams, where fraudsters promise to unlock a payout for an upfront fee. A real claims service never works that way.

How to act, whichever applies to you

The first move is the same in both worlds. Write things down and keep them.

Report the problem in writing and keep a copy, whether it is a repair request to a landlord or a complaint to a lender.

Photograph damp, mould or defects, and save statements showing interest, charges, commission or loan terms.

Note dates, names and what was promised, because a clear timeline is often the strongest part of a case.

Do not pay anyone an upfront fee to recover money for you.

Check the deadlines, because housing and finance claims both reward early action.

You can browse everything by topic through the housing disrepair section, car finance section, payday loan refund guides, and scam recovery section of the blog.

Frequently asked questions

Is my landlord breaking the law if they ignore repairs?

If your home has a serious hazard, your landlord knows about it, and they fail to act within a reasonable time, they may be breaching their legal duties. Awaab’s Law adds fixed timeframes for social landlords on emergency hazards and significant damp and mould hazards, while wider housing law still applies to rented homes more generally.

Can I be evicted for complaining about disrepair?

There are protections against retaliatory eviction, and the abolition of Section 21 no-fault evictions in the private rented sector from 1 May 2026 strengthens tenants’ position. A landlord may still seek possession on valid legal grounds, so get advice if you receive a notice after raising a complaint.

How much could a disrepair claim be worth?

It depends on the severity, how long the issue lasted, the impact on your health and belongings, and the rent paid for a home you could not fully use. A successful claim may involve repairs, compensation, a rent rebate or damages depending on the facts.

Do I need a claims company for car finance redress?

No. You can complain directly to your lender for free, and the FCA has made clear that consumers do not need to use a claims company. Some people still prefer support for convenience. If you use a service, check its fees and terms before agreeing.

Will any of these claims hurt my credit score?

Complaining about a lender should not harm your credit file. A successful affordability claim may lead to negative markers being corrected or removed where appropriate. A housing disrepair claim does not affect your credit score.

How long do I have to claim?

Finance complaints usually involve a 6-year rule, or 3 years from when you realised, or ought reasonably to have realised, that you had cause to complain, with scheme-specific cut-offs where relevant. Housing claims also have limitation periods, and evidence becomes harder over time, so it is best to check your dates early.

Stop absorbing the cost

If you recognise either pattern in your own life, the damp that never gets fixed or the agreement that never felt fair, it costs nothing to find out where you stand.

You can start your claim online in minutes or speak to the team first if you would rather talk it through. It is worth reading about the people behind Claim First, looking through the frequently asked questions, and seeing the outcomes for people already helped.

Everything runs on a no win, no fee basis, so the only thing you stand to lose is the cost you have been quietly carrying.

Building smooth, compliant case pipelines for litigation firms by combining lead generation, legal technology, and complete end-to-end case solutions.

Mark Blundell

Building smooth, compliant case pipelines for litigation firms by combining lead generation, legal technology, and complete end-to-end case solutions.

LinkedIn logo icon
Back to Blog